| 
	
UPDATED: 03.08.07
	 
	 
 | 
  | 
	
	
  |  
  
  
STO. NIÑO - IS IT BIBLICAL?
 
b y :   J o s e   F r a n c i s   M a r t i n e z
	 
  
      "See  to  it  that  no one  takes you captive through  philosophy 
       and  empty   deception, according to the tradition of men, 
       according to the elementary  principles of the  world, 
       rather than according to Christ." 
       [Col. 2:8]
  
 
 
 
NE PROMINENT feature of a religion in the Philippines is
the  veneration  of the  Sto.  Niño.  Although  many  are
questioning  its practice, different people use different 
  | 
 
A typical image  of the Sto.Niño | 
  
arguments to justify it.
In the text that heads, the Holy  Spirit, through the 
Apostle, commands  us  to be  very  careful of  deceptive 
arguments  that are according  to the  traditions of  men
rather  than  according to Christ.  And elsewhere, we are 
commanded to "examine everything carefully;  hold fast to 
that  which is  good;  abstain from  every  form of evil" 
[1 Thes 5:21,22].  In addition, Jesus  said, "And  if the
blind  leads  the  blind, both  will  fall  into  a  pit. 
[Mt 15:14]".
  
      
  The  following  common  are arguments  used to justify the
veneration and worship of the Sto. Niño:
  
| 1 | 
    
   The  sin  of  idolatry has exclusively  to do with the 
   worship of other gods.  But the image of the Sto. Niño
   is a  representation of Jesus  who is God.  Therefore,
   the worship of the Sto. Niño is not idolatry.  | 
  
      
In response to this  argument, there are 
two things to consider:
  
      
1. To say that the image of the Sto Niño represents Jesus
         is devious or dishonest.
  
      
   For  does  anyone  really  believe that Jesus who rose 
from  the grave  and ascended into  heaven is  accurately 
represented by the image of the Sto. Niño?  Jesus, now in 
heaven, is  a  grown  up  man!   So  how  can  the  image 
represent the Lord Jesus?
        
   Furthermore, if the image is a representation of Jesus
why  then  are  there  many different kinds of Sto. Niño.  
There is chinese-looking Sto Niño called the, "Sto Niño 
de Chino"  Another is  a  patron of the brown race called 
"Sto Niño de Nigro del Mundo."  There is  also a European 
- looking Sto Niño  dressed  like a  member  of  an  18th 
century  French  cavalier regiment.  There is also a Sto. 
Niño who is a boy fisherman with a fish in his hand.   He 
is also represented as a boy shepherd;  a boy shoe maker;
a boy emperor;  and  a  host of many others.  So which of 
these represent the Lord Jesus?
  
 
 
      
    In addition, if the image is just a representation of 
Jesus, then why do people give greater honor to one image 
above the other?  Everybody  knowns that the Sto. Niño on 
the  dash  board  of  many a jeepney is given very little 
care and attention.  But others are greatly revered.
  
      
2.To say that idolatry has to do exclusively with 
          the   worship   of  other  gods  is  also   empty 
          deception.  The  bible  makes  it clear that even 
        making & using representation of God is idolatry!
  
      
   This is clear in the 10 Commandments God gave at Mount
Sinai.  The  first commandment forbids the worship of any 
other gods  - "You  shall  have no other gods before Me". 
[Exodus 20:3]. But coming right after that, is the second 
commandment which may have omitted.  And that commandment 
forbids making or using representations in the worship of 
God.  "You  shall  not make  for yourself an idol, or any 
likeness  of  what  is  in  heaven  above or on the earth 
beneath or in  the  water under the earth.  You shall not 
worship  them or serve  them;  for I am the Lord your God, 
am a jealous God" [Exo. 20:4&5a].
  
      
   The plain  meaning of this commandment is confirmed in 
God's  admonitions  to  the  nation  of Israel prior to 
their entrance  to  the land of Canaan.  God said through 
Moses, "Watch yourselves carefully, since you did not see 
any  form on the  day the Lord spoke to you at Horeb from 
the midst of the fire" [Deut.4:15].  Now  why did God not 
appear  to them in any form?  Because God  was  afraid of 
something  the  people  might do.  Thus, God further said 
through Moses, "lest you act corruptly  and make a graven 
image for yourselves in the form of any figure, the likeness  
of male or female, the likeness  of any animal 
that is on the earth, the likeness of any bird that flies 
in  the  sky, the likeness of anything that creeps on the 
ground, the  likeness  of  any  fish that is in the water 
below the earth"[Deut 4:16-18].  God knew that the people 
had that sinful  tendency to make representations of Him 
in violation  of  His second commandment.  Therefore, the 
Lord will not appear to them in any form.
  
      
   Furthermore, the  violation  of  this  commandment  is 
clearly  illustrated  in  the  sin  of  the Israelites by 
making a golden  calf.  Why did the people  make a golden 
calf?  Not  that they might worship other gods.  But they 
wanted a representation of God!   This is clear in Exodus 
32.  After  making  the golden calf, Aaron said, "This is 
your god, O Israel - who brought you out from the land of 
Egypt"[Ex.32:4].  In other words, that image was intended 
to represent God who brought the people out of Egypt with 
signs and wonders.  In addition, Aaron said to the people 
after the golden calf was finished,  "Tomorrow shall be a 
feast to the Lord" [Ex.32:5].  The celebration the people 
made was intended for the Lord.
  
      
   How did God react to this? The Lord said to Moses, "Go 
down at once, for your people, whom  you brought out from 
the land  of Egypt have  corrupted themselves.  They have 
quickly turned aside from the way I commanded them.  They 
have made for themselves a molten calf, & have worshipped 
it" [Exo 32:7&8].  Moreover, God said, "I  have seen this 
people, & behold, they are an obstinate people"[Ex.32:9].  | 
  | 
  | 
 
| 
this article is also featured in 
christiantoday.com.ph | 
 
 
  
 
      
   Therefore, even  to  make  representations  of  God is 
idolatry.  It is a sin against the Lord.  "But what about 
the brazen serpent that God  commanded the people to make 
in the wilderness?"  First, it must  be  emphasized  that 
the  brazen  serpent  was  not  a  representation of God.  
Moreover, what  happened to that brazen serpent?  We read 
in the scriptures, "He," King Hezekiah, "did what was right 
in  the  sight  of the Lord, according to what his father 
David had done.  He removed the high places &  broke down 
the sacred pillars and cut down the Asherah (w/c were the 
common  paraphernalia  of  idolatrous  worship).  He also 
broke in pieces the  bronze  serpent that Moses made, for 
until those days the sons of Israel burned incense to it"
[1 Kng 18:3&4].  That bronze serpent was never made to be 
a representation of God, nor  was  it  ever  intended  to 
become  an object to  be worshipped.  Thus, by destroying 
it, King Hezekiah  did what was right in the sight of the 
Lord.
  
      
   But what about the 'Ark of the Covenant' God commanded 
Moses to make in  the wilderness?  First, it  needs to be 
stressed  that  there was no representation of God in the 
Ark of the Covenant.  There were 2 cherubims covering the 
"mercy seat."  But there  was no representation of God in 
it (please read Ex. 25:10-22).  In addition, that ark was 
never  to  be  seen  by  the  people.  It is always to be 
covered. For anyone who would look at it would die! (Pls. 
read Num 4:5,6; 1 Sam 6:19).  Therefore, to  use  the Ark 
of   the  Covenant  as  a  way  to  justify  the  use  of 
representations of  God  is  a desperate effort to try to 
find support in the Bible for a practice God condemns.
  
      
   So  the  use  of the image of Sto. Niño is nothing but 
sheer idolatry. It is a gross violation of God's command
ment. It is displeasing to God & stirs up His holy anger!
| 2 | 
    
    All miracles come from God. And the Sto. Niño is known 
    to perform miracles.  Therefore, the Sto Niño is God -
    approved.  | 
  
      
   However,
  
      
   1.  It  is  claimed that pagan idols perform miracles.  
That  is  why  they are  venerated.  So there  is nothing 
peculiar different about the Sto.  Niño from  those pagan 
idols.
  
      
   2.  The  supposed miracles of the Sto. Niño do not fit 
the biblical characteristics of a miracle. For one thing, 
they  are  trivial   and  are  not undeniably convincing.  
Biblical  miracles are of such that  they  could  not  be 
denied to be  real miracles even by sceptics and critics.  
Thus even those who vehemently opposed Jesus Christ could 
not deny the factuality of the miracles He performed.  We 
read in John 11:47, 48  what the  Pharisees and the chief 
priest in a council said, "What are  we  doing?  For this 
Man (Jesus Christ)  is  performing many signs.  If we let 
Him go  on like this, all men  will  believe Him, and the 
Romans  will  come  and  take away both our place and our 
nation."
  
      
   3.  The  Bible  clearly   teaches   that   God  allows 
counterfeit  miracles  to occur  in judgment on those who 
refuse  to believe the truth God  has revealed.  The Holy 
Spirit, through Paul, speaking of the  Anti-Christ, says, 
"that is,  the  one  whose  coming  is in accord with the 
activity  of  Satan, with  all  power and signs and false 
wonders, & with all the deception of wickedness for those 
who  perish, because they did not receive the love of the 
truth  so  as  to be saved.  And for this reason God will 
send them a deluding  influence  so  that they all may be 
judged who did not believe  the truth, but took  pleasure 
in wickedness." (2 Thess. 2:9-11).
  
 
| 3 | 
    
    The  use of the image of the Sto Niño only serves as a 
    gradual transition from  paganism to Christianity.  It 
    serves only as a link or bridge.  | 
  
      
   When  the  Spaniards  came, they  found  the Filipinos 
wedded to  pagan  practices.  Therefore, they  could  not 
just introduce Christianity righ away.  A link was needed 
and since the Filipinos  were already worshipping 'anito' 
gods, the Sto Niño served as a convenient link or bridge. 
  
      
   In  response  to  this  argument  often  used  by  the 
educated, there are three things to examine:
  
      
   1.  If the  practice  serves only  as a link, then why 
are there  no efforts  being  made  to  get  rid  of  the 
practice?  Everybody  knows  that  in  Cebu, it  is being    |  | Santo Niño de Atocha |   
zealously   promoted   yearly   through   the   "sinulog" 
celebrations.  And the "(Roman Catholic) priests" do not preach 
against  the  practice.  They  encourage the people to be 
zealous for it.
  
      
   2.  It  must be  understood that the end never justify 
the means.  No matter how  good and noble the end we have 
in view, we are  never at liberty  to use any means which 
is clear violation of God's  commandments.  Never!  Those 
who justify the use of  the image on the grounds  of that 
the end  justifies  are  saying  that they are wiser than 
God!  They  are  saying that  somehow  God  is  wrong  in 
forbiding  the  use  of  imgaes  because  it  is the most 
convenient  link  between   paganism   and  Christianity.  
Blasphemy!
  
      
   3.  The  method  of  approach  used by the Apostles in 
evangelizing  pagan societies was entirely different from 
the  method used by the  Spaniards.  A careful reading of 
the New Testament clearly proves this.  Please read: Acts 
14:8-18;  17:16-31;  19:23-41;  1 Thes. 1:9,10.
  
| 4 | 
    
    The devotion to the image of the Sto Niño particularly 
    during  its  annual festival  is  a great boost to the 
    economy.  | 
  
      
   It greatly  helps  the  government's  efforts to boost 
tourism.  Besides, it  helps  vendors  make  a  living by 
selling these images.  So, why make a fuss about it?
  
      
   Now what about this argument?
  
      
   Well, no doubt that the devotion to the Sto. Niño does 
help  economically.  But how does God view those who make 
religion as a means of material gain?  God abominates it.  
He hates it.
  
      
   This is clear in the two episodes where the Lord Jesus 
cleanced  the temple in Jerusalem - that temple which was 
part of the  Old  Covenant  worship.  We read, "And Jesus 
entered the temple and cast out all those who were buying 
and selling in  the temple, and  overturned the tables of 
the money changers and the seat of those who were selling 
doves."  [Mt.21:12].  Please read also John 2:13-17.
  
 
| 5 | 
    
    The  image  of  the  Sto. Niño is a matter of national 
    identity and pride.  | 
  
      
   It makes Christianity in the Philippines distinctively 
Filipino.  If  we  do  away  with it, then we destroy our 
cultural identity.  But what does  Scriptures  say  about 
this  argument?   Proverbs  14:13  reads,  "Righteousness 
exalts a  nation, but  sin is a  disgrace to any people."  
The  use of the image is  not  a matter  of pride  but of 
shame!
  
      
   Besides, the  Scriptures  tell  us  of the frightening 
consequence of those who practice idolatry.  God in wrath 
will abandon any nation which practices idolatry - sexual 
uncleanness, sexual perversity, and callousness of heart.  
Please read Romans 1:18-32.
  
 
My dear reader, if you agree with 
those who approve of 
the use of the image of the Sto Niño & even go along with 
it, then you've  been carried away by vain philosophy and 
empty   deception.  This  practice  is  sin  against  God 
Almighty.  And I urge you to repent of it and turn to the 
risen  Christ for  salvation.  For  those who continue in 
this practice will be cast into the lake of fire.  As Rev 
21:8 puts it, "but for the  cowardly  and unbelieving and 
abominable  and  murderers  and   immoral   persons   and 
socerrers and  idolaters  and all liars, their part  will 
be in the lake that burns with  fire and brimstone, which 
is the second death."
  
      
   But if you are one who is a true disciple of Christ, a 
true christian, then  stay away from festivities in honor 
of  the  Sto. Niño.  As  we are exhorted in 1 Cor. 10:14, 
"Therefore, my beloved, flee from idolatry". Let us never 
soften  our  stand  against this abominable practice, but 
let us be bold to declare to the people their sins.
http://sgbc.faithweb.com
 
  
Related Topics: 
The Atheist Option
Philippine Slothfulness
Going abroad
Sinulog
  |   |   
 | 
  | 
  | 
disable pop-ads
  
  
 
  
  
 |   | 
  
 |